Skip to main content

Moons of Jupiter

The clear evening skies at the moment have provided great views of Jupiter, which is currently well placed for Northern Hemisphere observers.

To get a closer look, I got out my Russian MTO 11CA, which is a 1000mm f10 mirror lens originally built for the Soviet military in the Cold War period. It is built like the proverbial tank and reasonably sharp for such modestly priced lens. I hooked it up to my Panasonic GF-1 via an M42 to micro 4/3 adapter. This gives an equivalent focal length of an enormous 2000mm!

MTO 11CA 1000mm f10 Mirror Lens


Pointing the combo at Jupiter showed a clear view of the four brightest moons:

Jupiter's 4 brightest moons
L-R: Callisto, Ganymede, Jupiter, Io and Europa

Unfortunately, there is no surface detail visible on Jupiter and the whole image is lacking in sharpness. This was mainly due to difficulties in keeping the lens still, as it is a light lens with a long focal length, making it susceptible to the slightest vibration. It doesn't help that the tripod mount is a rather weak and shallow affair and the night air was also not particularly still, due to the very warm weather. Still, amazing what you can see without a telescope...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Merging Git Repositories

No project of significant size that I've ever seen has retained its initial structure. Restructuring projects is a fact of life, but unfortunately Git doesn't make it easy. Fundamentally this stems from the way Git works, treating changes as a succession of snapshots and not storing any other metadata. Of course this is part of what makes Git fast and efficient, but at the expense of making some common operations more difficult for users. Git really is a perfect 21st century illustration of the classic  "Worse Is Better"  paradigm of successful software 😀 Previously I discussed how to split a Git project apart into separate repositories . Now I'm going to discuss how to do the opposite and merge separate repositories into one. On the face of it, this would seem a simpler task as Git has powerful support for merging... Let's take the opposite example to my splitting apart article - say you have a main Git repo (ProjA) and a second repo (ProjB) in...

East Devon Continued

Some iPhone pictures: Seaton Bay from Beer Hill at Sunset Gulls on Beer Beach We also had a pair of Pheasants in the garden, which was a bit of a surprise. There are always plenty of rabbits and wild birds, but this is the first time I've seen game birds. Here is the male, sitting on the garden wall, wondering what I'm up to: Male Pheasant I also spotted these attractive white Cyclamen in the garden: Cyclamen

Renaming Files in Git

Renaming Files I recently had to rename a lot of files in brf-mode for submission into MELPA . These files have 10+ years of version control history I wanted to keep. In the process I realised retaining all that history in Git isn't as simple as I thought 😀 I thought it was as simple as using git mv rather than filesystem  mv and Git would know everything had been renamed. It turns out I was wrong and I should have known that from my knowledge of how Git works 😖 In reality, Git works by storing snapshots rather than file or directory metadata and git mv is just a convenience shortcut for typing: $ mv <old name> <new name> $ git rm <old name> $ git add <new name> That's all there is to it! Now the "magic" happens when you git log or git blame a file and Git works out the file was renamed by diffing the contents.  If files have the same contents (within a certain threshold %) it thinks a rename happened. See here in the  Gi...